Mental Situation Calculus
نویسنده
چکیده
The situation calculus of (McCarthy and Hayes 1969) 1 has mainly been used to reason about states of the physical world, taking into account the locations and physical properties of objects and admitting such events as moving them. Analogously we can consider a mental situation calculus (MSC) in which the situations include beliefs, goals, intentions and other mental qualit ies, and the events include inferring, observing, establishing goals and discharging them. MSC has several motivations: . MSC involves reifying beliefs, and one of i ts basic forms wi l l be believes(< proposition>, ss) standing for the assertion that the proposition is believed in mental situation ss. The formalism allows for belief not to be closed under inference. In fact one of the possible mental actions is to make an inference. Therefore, we can describe in detail the circumstances under which we want our system to make inferences. . Non-monotonic reasoning requires closer control over inference than deduction, because of i ts tentative character. Some problems that have recently arisen with blocks world axiomatizations may require that circumscription be control led in accordance with the pedigree of the system's objective beliefs and not merely being determined by what the beliefs are. . I t looks l ike several useful methods of control of reasoning can be accomplished by hil l-climbing in mental situation space. Besides reifying beliefs, MSC involves reifying goals and partial plans for achieving them. Depending on progress the paper to be presented wil l include both general discussion of MSC and specific formalizations. 1M~arthy, John and P.J. Hayes. 1969: "Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Ar t i f i c ia l Intelligence." In Machine Intelligence 4, edited by D. Michie. American Elsevier, New York, NY.
منابع مشابه
A Declarative Formalization of STRIPS
We present a declarative formalization of STRIPS [1] as a reasoning strategy in the situation calculus [10]. The idea is to use logic not only to represent planning problems, but also to describe the mental situations, mental actions and reasoning strategy STRIPS uses to solve those problems.
متن کاملInfinite Paths in the Situation Calculus: Axiomatization and Properties
The situation calculus has proved to be a very popular formalism for modeling and reasoning about dynamic systems. This otherwise elegant and refined language however lacks a natural way of dealing with “infinite future histories”. To this end, in this paper we introduce a new sort ranging over infinite paths in the situation calculus and propose an axiomatization for infinite paths. We thus ob...
متن کاملSituation awareness and capacity in coalitions
In this paper, we propose a discussion on formal notions situation awareness and capacity in a coalition. ..... ... We show the connection of a state-based logical model and an actionbased logical model. The first model, named Interpreted systems is based on epsitimic logic notions and has been identified as a candidate for the formalisation of the situation analysis problem. The second model, ...
متن کاملIntegrating State Constraints and Obligations in Situation Calculus
The ramification problem concerns the characterisation of indirect effects of actions. This problem arises when a theory of action is integrated with a set of state constraints. So integrating state constraints to a solution of the frame problem must deal with the ramification problem. In the situation calculus a general solution to both the frame and ramification problems has been proposed. Th...
متن کاملAgents' Dynamic Mental Attitudes
We present a rst-order formalism for dealing with agents' cognitive attitudes in a dynamic setting. We rst extend our ontology in order to represent agents' beliefs and goals. These mental attitudes are expressed in the situation calculus by means of accessibility uents that represent accessibility relations among alternative situations. Then, we consider changes of mental attitudes in a dynami...
متن کامل